Call us today at (215) 825-5183.

Call the Philadelphia Criminal Attorneys at Levin and Zeiger LLP today.

Call us today at (215) 825-5183.

Call the Philadelphia Criminal Attorneys at Levin and Zeiger LLP today.

Call us today at (215) 825-5183.

Call the Philadelphia Criminal Attorneys at Levin and Zeiger LLP today.

Call us today at (215) 825-5183.

Call the Philadelphia Criminal Attorneys at Levin and Zeiger LLP today.

Call us today at (215) 825-5183.

Call the Philadelphia Criminal Attorneys at Levin and Zeiger LLP today.

Monday, October 26, 2009

DUI DUI, Nieves is bad law!

DUI update. We have been asked so many questions regarding DUIs where the person gets a second DUI arrest before being convicted of the first. Our answers have been all over the board with our strateies, but the basis for my answers was that a case called Nieves prevented a consolidation of DUIs as two first DUIs. We had all kinds of strategies to minimize the poor law set in Nieves.

The wait is over. On October 23, 2009, in Commonwealth v. Haag, Justice McCaffery wrote for a unanimous Court, overruling Nieves and its progeny. You must be CONVICTED of the first DUI before the arrest of the second, otherwise, you have two first DUIs.

As an aside for any legal scholars, the cases specifically overruled are Misner, Nieves and Stafford.

Cheers to the Supremes!

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Is my record expunged after I complete ARD?

After I complete ARD (Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition) is my record expunged automatically?

NO! Your record is not expunged automatically upon completion of ARD. If you were on ARD and you successfully completed ARD and paid all of your fines and costs, the record of your arrest was NOT erased. Feel free to contact our office for help.

Do I have a right to plea No Contest or Nolo Contendere?

The District Attorney is offering me one year reporting probation. My lawyer tells me that if I go to trial and lose I will get one to two years up state. While, I didn't commit the crime, I really don't want to go to jail for something I didn't do. Do I have a right to plea no contest or nolo contendere?

No contest and nolo contendere are the same thing. The idea of a nolo plea means that you are not contesting the charges, not because you did it but because you do not wish to face the prospect of going through a long costly trial and/or going to jail.

However, you do not have a right to plea no contest. The district attorney must agree to a nolo plea. There are many goods and bads about a nolo plea. The main issue with a nolo plea is that you are not admitting that you did anything wrong. The bad part about not admitting that you did anything bad is that at sentencing you cannot argue to the judge that you should get a break at sentencing for accepting responsibility for your actions. For many judges, from both sides of the aisle, this is the single biggest factor in applying the sentencing guidelines.

The good part of the no contest plea is that if the case is a sex offense or a theft offense, the conviction cannot be used against you if you testify at a future court proceeding because your answer is simply that you did NOT admit to anything.

Sometimes, if you plea no contest to a sex offense, the probation department will make you go to sex classes where you will be pressured to admit that you in fact sexually assaulted someone. A no contest plea allows you to deny the charges. This can get sticky, but the subject of probation violations is an entirely different question.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Public Urination Disorderly Conduct

I was pissing in the parking lot of a sporting event and a liquor control board (lcb) officer gave me a ticket for disorderly conduct--its a summary offense. I wasn't doing anything wrong; I was quite discrete about the whole thing. This is NOT in Philadelphia County. How do I beat this?

On the ticket plea not guilty and ask for a hearing. Appear at the hearing and see if the LCB officer appears. If the officer does not appear, the case will get continued or discharged. If the officer appears, tell your story to the judge and apologize for your behavior.

If it was in Philadelphia, you should get night court. If you have a night court question, write a comment to this post and I will respond with an answer.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Gun in the House, convicted felon, gun not mine. Help!

I am a convicted felon. I do not have a gun. I understand that I am not allowed to possess a gun because it is illegal under 6105. My wife owns a gun. I want to know, can she bring the gun in the house and store it in the house if I am living there?

No. Keep the gun out of the house. Regardless of the case law, if the cops say that you are anywhere near the gun, or that you have any thing to do with the gun at all, regardless of the type of possession, it is VUFA 6105, if the cops can articulate facts that show that you were in any type of legal possession of the gun. The sentencing guidelines on 6105 are atrocious, so DO NOT live in any house where there is a gun. Move, separate, divorce, just stay away from guns.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Lying Witness

I am being charge with a crime. I am going to trial before a jury. The only witnesses are three cops. They are all liars. If they continue to lie at the trial, can the judge throw out the case before it gets to the jury?

Not really. The purpose of a jury trial if for the jurors to decide who is lying or not lying. Your job, or your lawyers job is to convince the jury that the cops are liars. The DA's job is to convince the jury that the cops are telling the truth. That is the whole purpose of the jury system.

While on ARD I got a second DUI, what am I looking at?

I got a DUI in January. I got in ARD in April. I got a second DUI in July. What am I looking at?

This is a very complicated answer. There are four scenarios. In general, if you get ARD (accelerated rehabilitative disposition) for a DUI (driving under the influence), you complete ARD, and you get a new DUI, that new DUI is considered a second DUI for legal purposes in Pennsylvania. Your sentence would be based on the DUI mandatory minimums for a second DUI. That range of time is 5 days, 30 days, or 90 days depending on what is found in your body based on the testing. If the testing is called a "refusal" its 90 days.

The second scenario is when the second arrest is not in the same county as the first arrest. There is a chance, however slight, that the second county will not know that you are on ARD in the first county. If that is the case, you should plea guilty as soon as possible to the second DUI, because if they don't know about the ARD DUI, they may treat the second DUI as a first DUI. The range of time for that is zero days in jail, 48 hours, or 72 hours depending on what is found in your body based on testing. If the testing is called a "refusal" its 72 hours. Be careful doing this as it can blow-up on you.

The third scenario is when both the old and new case are in the same county and the county has a policy of yanking ARD for DUIs when you get a second DUI while on ARD for a first DUI. In that case, you will be able to fight both cases simultaneously. However, you don't want to fight anything, you want to plea on the case with the higher tier, then get a continuance on the case with the lower tier. Then after you do your time on the higher tier, plea on the second DUI with the lower tier. That way you get the least amount of time. The only exception to this answer is that some counties allow you to serve work release or house arrest on your DUIs. If this happened in one of those counties, you should combine the cases and take work release or house arrest; especially house arrest.

The fourth scenario only pertains to Philadelphia County. In that case, if you are on ARD and they do NOT revoke the ARD, the new DUI is a second DUI, see answer one above. However, if they revoke the ARD in Philly, you can do something very special. In Philly, you can take a de novo appeal (a do over) even after a plea (called a stipulated trial). Accordingly, you take either case and do a stip trial (open plea), get the mandatory minimum on a first DUI as stated in answer 2 above. Then you take a de novo appeal, which erases the conviction. Then do a stip trial on the other case. You should get the mandatory minimum as a first DUI because the de novo appeal on the first case erased the conviction; you should get a sentence for a first DUI; see answer 2 above. Then appear in Common Pleas Court for the de novo appeal and withdraw the appeal; the lower court sentence will be reinstated as a matter of law. In effect, you get two first DUIs. Note, that you should wait thirty days from the date of the sentencing in the second case to withdraw the de novo appeal because the District Attorney can't appeal to the Superior Court once 30 have past because after 30 days the sentencing is a final order and an appeal is deemed void abinitio! If you don't wait 30 days, the DA will appeal to the Superior Court and we don't want that.

License Issues: as an aside, if you get a second DUI while driving on a suspended ARD DUI license, you are looking at 90 days just for the driving while suspended. If the DA has any salt, they will use that as leverage against you to get you to plea on the two DUIs together. Also, stop driving until the state gives you your license back, and even then consider not driving. If you get a third, you are going to go to jail for a very very long time.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Federal Preseidential Pardons

Can the President of the United States Pardon someone for a State offense?

For whatever reason I have been asked this question several times over the last couple of weeks and I did not think it was post worthy. However, I must be wrong, because I keep getting the question.

This answer requires a definitional section. A federal offense is one where you were convicted in federal court. In all prosecutions in federal court the offense is against the United States of America. The cases are all captioned US v. Smith. In state court the offense is against the state. In Pennsylvania the cases are captioned Commonwealth v. Smith, but in some states the cases are captioned like Arizona v. Miranda.

Every state has its own way to grant the governor power to pardon and to restore rights of those previously convicted. In the federal system, only the President can grant a pardon, but in the federal system, the president has about 8 different types of pardons. I won't write them, hearing, but if folks want them listed, just send an email and I will post. The point is that not all pardons are created equally.

The president can only pardon people convicted in the federal system and governors can only pardon people convicted in their own respective states.

Hope this clears up questions about federal presidential pardons. If not, write a comment or send an email.

Sunday, October 4, 2009

DUIs & Bad Offers

I have a terrible juvenile record. I have really cleaned up since I was a kid. I just got a DUI, which is my first offense as an adult. Its a 3 day mandatory minimum. The DA offered me 9-23 months. My lawyer said its a bad offer due to my juvenile record. What can I do? I want to plea guilty? How can they do this?

Your juvenile history is looked at for purposes of sentencing until you are 27. The current offense is not relevant to your prior record score; the current offense is only relevant to your offense gravity score.

If the offer from the DA is more than your guidelines and more then the mandatory minimum, you can always plea open. Most judges don't give more then the mando on DUI's unless you had a bad accident, acted like an ass to the cops, or were very far over the limit in third tier. If I get a DA that is being difficult, an open plea on a DUI is often a good answer.

The only thing I would think about: DUIs are very hard for the DA to make out at trial. If you have any issues, you may wish to fight.